UniAVC: Unified Audio-Video Creation via Progressive Training and Asymmetric Scheduling

Kien T. Pham1, Yuhao Liu2, Chong Hou Choi2, Zhenqi He1, Yanghao Wang1, Chenyang Lei2, Rui Liu2, Qifeng Chen1, Long Chen1
1The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 2Huawei Research
UniAVC task overview
UniAVC performs joint audio-video generation, cross-modal generation in either direction, and instruction-guided editing of either or both modalities from one set of weights.

Abstract

Unified audio-video creation requires a single model capable of text-conditioned joint synthesis, bidirectional cross-modal generation, and instruction-guided editing across both modalities. Existing methods rely heavily on paired corpora, which are scarce for joint generation and even rarer for editing. Consequently, they are spent learning single-branch generative and editing capabilities that abundant unimodal data could readily teach, rather than on the cross-modal coupling. Furthermore, prevailing systems apply a single shared noise schedule to both modalities, neglecting two critical limitations. First, due to the significant discrepancy in information density, video requires prolonged high noise to organize spatial and motion structure, whereas the sparser audio signal can settle earlier during the synthesis process, the dynamics a uniform schedule might compromise. Second, lockstep denoising leaves asymmetric workflows, such as conditioning on one modality to synthesize or edit another, untrained. We present UniAVC, which addresses both obstacles. It first trains each branch on unimodal dataset to full generative and editing competence, and subsequently dedicates paired data to exploit cross-modal correspondence. Modality-decoupled schedulers meanwhile warp the noise schedule independently from a shared timestep, while subtasks with one clean modality directly supervise asymmetric configurations. These settings respectively enable intent-aware editing, which preserves one modality intact while enlisting it to constrain the other, and post-inference self-refinement, which regenerates only an unsatisfactory branch against an accepted one. UniAVC thus spans multiple creation tasks from a single set of weights without task-specific adapters. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UniAVC achieves versatile audio-video generation and editing with competitive performance across different operating modes.

Highlights

  • 1 Unified generation and editing framework. A single model natively performs text-conditioned joint audio-video generation, bidirectional cross-modal synthesis, and instruction-guided editing of either or both modalities without requiring task-specific adapters.
  • 2 Progressive training paradigm. By first mastering unimodal generative and editing capabilities on single-modality corpora before freezing both branches, our framework dedicates scarce paired datasets entirely to establishing cross-modal correspondence and temporal synchronization.
  • 3 Asymmetric noise-level scheduling. Modality-decoupled schedulers derive per-branch noise trajectories from a shared timestep index to steer training off the diagonal of the 2D noise space, while clean-branch subtasks explicitly supervise extreme boundary states, together enabling intent-aware editing and post-inference self-refinement.
  • 4 Extensive empirical evaluation. Comprehensive experiments across diverse generation and editing benchmarks demonstrate that UniAVC achieves performance competitive with specialized state-of-the-art baselines across all supported creation modes.

Method

UniAVC framework
Illustration of the UniAVC framework. (a) Two transformer stacks process video and audio, intersecting exclusively at per-block cross-attention bridges whose modulation is driven by the partner branch's noise level. Reference latents enter as in-context tokens concatenated to target tokens, with attention masks applied so that reference tokens do not attend to noisy tokens in either self- or cross-attention blocks. (b) Each branch first attains full generative and editing competence on unimodal data in parallel; both branches are subsequently frozen, and the paired corpus is used solely to train the cross-modal bridges.

Why one schedule cannot serve both streams

  • Structural and token disparity. Video maintains a dense spatio-temporal structure, while audio is compressed into a highly sparse sequence. As a result, visual tokens outnumber audio tokens by more than an order of magnitude.
  • Distinct convergence timing. Video requires a prolonged high-noise phase to establish global structure, motion, and identity, whereas audio settles into its final acoustic content much earlier.
  • The shared schedule compromise. Tuning a single noise schedule for video leaves audio artificially noisy (ruining cross-modal conditioning), while tuning it for audio forces video to commit to fine details prematurely.
  • Diagonal training restriction. Forcing equal noise levels on both streams restricts training to symmetric, "diagonal" noise states. This leaves the model completely unequipped for asymmetric tasks at inference, such as generating video conditioned on clean audio.
Single versus dual noise schedules
Single vs. dual noise schedules.

Quantitative Results

Joint audio-video editing results
Quantitative comparisons for joint audio-video editing on JAVEditBench and the test split of InsAVE-80K.
Joint generation results on Verse-Bench
Quantitative comparisons for joint generation on Verse-Bench.
Cross-modal generation results on VGGSound
Quantitative comparisons for cross-modal generation on the VGGSound test split.

Comparisons with the State of the Art

Versatility Demos

Inference Modes

Joint Generation Gallery

BibTeX

@article{pham2026uniavc,
  title   = {UniAVC: Unified Audio-Video Creation via Progressive Training and Asymmetric Scheduling},
  author  = {Pham, Kien T. and Liu, Yuhao and Choi, Chong Hou and He, Zhenqi and Wang, Yanghao
             and Lei, Chenyang and Liu, Rui and Chen, Qifeng and Chen, Long},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.24791},
  year    = {2026}
}